The Role of Applied Metalinguistic Awareness and English Language Teaching Strategies in Enhancing EFL Learners’ Language Skills and Cognitive Skills

Authors

  • Zamroni Zamroni Universitas Nahdhatul Wathan Mataram, Indonesia
  • Hendra Suryadi Institut Pendidikan Nusantara Global, Indonesia
  • Mali Kwanjai Walailak University, Thailand
  • Choan Way Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM) Cawangan Kedah, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36312/j4rr9p07

Keywords:

Applied metalinguistic awareness, ELT strategies, EFL learners, Language skills, Cognitive development

Abstract

Applied metalinguistic awareness (AMA) has gained increasing attention as an important component in foreign language education because it enables learners to consciously understand, analyze, and regulate their language use. This study aims to explore the role of AMA within ELT strategies and examine its contribution to EFL learners’ linguistic and cognitive development in Indonesian and Thai contexts. A qualitative research design was employed involving 27 EFL learners, consisting of 14 Indonesian and 13 Thai learners. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and classroom observations. The data were analyzed using thematic analysis based on data condensation, data display, and conclusion verification. The findings revealed five major patterns of AMA integration: explicit language reflection, metalinguistic corrective feedback, task-based reflective activities, translanguaging practices, and technology-supported learning. The findings further indicate that AMA-integrated ELT strategies enhanced learners’ language accuracy, communicative competence, self-regulation, critical thinking, and problem-solving abilities. The study concludes that AMA functions as a reflective pedagogical framework that connects linguistic knowledge, meaningful communication, and cognitive development. The novelty of this study lies in integrating AMA with communicative, task-based, translanguaging, and technology-enhanced ELT approaches within Indonesian and Thai EFL contexts. The findings provide implications for teachers and curriculum developers seeking to create more reflective, autonomous, and cognitively engaging English learning environments.

Author Biographies

  • Zamroni Zamroni, Universitas Nahdhatul Wathan Mataram, Indonesia

    English Language Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Nahdlatul Wathan Mataram, West Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia

  • Hendra Suryadi, Institut Pendidikan Nusantara Global, Indonesia

    English Language Education Study Program, Institut Pendidikan Nusantara Global, Central Lombok, West Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia

  • Mali Kwanjai, Walailak University, Thailand

    Language Studies, School of Languages and General Education, Walailak University, Thailand

  • Choan Way, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM) Cawangan Kedah, Malaysia

    Academy of Language Study, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM) Cawangan Kedah, Kampus Sungai Petani, Malaysia

References

Alasmari, M., Qasem, F., Ahmed, R., & Alrayes, M. (2022). Bilingual teachers’ translanguaging practices and ideologies in online classrooms in Saudi Arabia. Heliyon, 8(9), e10537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10537

Alhazmi, A. W. (2024). Investigating preparatory year Saudi students’ preferences towards different feedback methods to improve their writing in EFL classrooms. International Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 3(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.33422/ijsfle.v3i2.721

Ardell, L. (2021). Language and words: How vocabulary teaching indexes teacher histories and beliefs about language. TESOL Quarterly, 56(2), 582–602. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3069

Aydın, F. (2023). Investigating L2 explicit knowledge and its reflection in written proficiency of Turkish EFL learners. International Journal of TESOL Studies. https://doi.org/10.58304/ijts.20230402

Azadian, M., Tafaa, T., & Bhotana, E.(2026). Investigating EFL Learners’ Metalinguistic Understanding in Refining Their Academic Writing: A Lesson from Teachers’ Writing Feedback, Journal of Applied Metalinguisticsand Language Instruction, 1(1), 1-18, Doi: https://doi.org/10.36312/4jj5w376

Birrina, D. F., & Emaliana, I. (2022). Sustaining TBLT during online learning: The role of EFL teacher agency. Scope: Journal of English Language Teaching, 7(1), 34. https://doi.org/10.30998/scope.v7i1.13854

Boonsuk, Y., & Ambele, E. A. (2021). Existing EFL pedagogies in Thai higher education: Views from Thai university lecturers. Arab World English Journal, 12(2), 125–141. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol12no2.9

Burner, T., & Carlsen, C. (2023). Teachers’ multilingual beliefs and practices in English classrooms: A scoping review. Review of Education, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3407

Cinaglia, C., & Costa, P. I. D. (2022). Cultivating critical translingual awareness: Challenges and possibilities for teachers and teacher educators. RELC Journal, 53(2), 452–459. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882221113659

Editor, I. (2024). Abstracts of the 4th International Conference of TESOL & Education. ICTE Conference Proceedings, 4, 1–98. https://doi.org/10.54855/ictep.244

Esch, K. S. V., Motha, S., & Kubota, R. (2020). Race and language teaching. Language Teaching, 53(4), 391–421. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444820000269

Fu, Y. (2022). EFL teachers’ beliefs and practices regarding task-based language teaching in the Asian context. International Journal of Education and Humanities, 5(2), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.54097/ijeh.v5i2.1978

Ha, X. V., Nguyen, L. T., & Bui, H. P. (2021). Oral corrective feedback in English as a foreign language classrooms: A teaching and learning perspective. Heliyon, 7(7), e07550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07550

Ilahude, F. F., Inawati, I., & Pratolo, B. W. (2023). Teachers’ TPACK development in English language teaching: A systematic review. Premise: Journal of English Education, 12(3), 911. https://doi.org/10.24127/pj.v12i3.7429

Khalil, L., & Semono-Eke, B. K. (2020). Appropriate teaching methods for general English and English for specific purposes from teachers’ perspectives. Arab World English Journal, 11(1), 253–269. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol11no1.19

Liu, Y., & Ren, W. (2021). Task-based language teaching in a local EFL context: Chinese university teachers’ beliefs and practices. Language Teaching Research, 28(6), 2234–2250. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211044247

Lubis, A. H., & Samsudin, D. (2021). Characteristics of an effective EFL teacher in Indonesia: Expectations and realities in a technology-enhanced flipped classroom. IJELTAL (Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 5(2), 417. https://doi.org/10.21093/ijeltal.v5i2.820

Lume, L., Mai, J., & Marie, P.A.(2026). Integrating Task-Based Language Teaching Model with Deep LearningPrinciplesin Developing EFL Learners’ Metalinguistic Competences, Journal of Applied Metalinguisticsand Language Instruction, 1(1), 19-34, Doi: https://doi.org/10.36312/17nzq381

Marzuki, M. J. (2022). Enacting a task-based language teaching curriculum in Indonesian non-formal education (INFE): Rationales and challenges. Edulangue, 5(1), 66–86. https://doi.org/10.20414/edulangue.v5i1.5109

Matiso, N. H. (2023). Social transformation in English first additional language teaching and learning classrooms: Multilingual pedagogy. E-Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences, 1515–1526. https://doi.org/10.38159/ehass.202341310

Maulana, M. I. (2021). Task-based language teaching: Potential benefits and possible criticisms in Indonesian contexts. Journal of English Teaching and Learning Issues, 4(2), 69. https://doi.org/10.21043/jetli.v4i2.12183

Mohsina, & Naziba. (2022). The pedagogical procedures and indicators of post-methods for English language teaching: A theoretical perspective. Journal for Research Scholars and Professionals of English Language Teaching, 6(32). https://doi.org/10.54850/jrspelt.6.32.008

Möller-Omrani, C., & Sivertsen, A.-K. H. (2022). Should the elementary school EFL classroom contribute to developing multilingualism? Pre-service teacher cognitions about pluralistic approaches to EFL teaching and cross-linguistic awareness. Languages, 7(2), 109. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages7020109

Nghia, V. N. D., & Nguyen, Q. N. (2021). Task-based language teaching to enhance learner communicative competence in Vietnam: A matter of opinion? International Journal of Linguistics, Literature & Translation, 4(8), 151–159. https://doi.org/10.32996/ijllt.2021.4.8.22

Poonpon, K., Satthamnuwong, B., & Sameephet, B. (2022). The effectiveness of task-based and genre-based integrated learning on English language proficiency of Thai rural secondary school students. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 12(9), 1736–1747. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1209.05

Pourmohammadi, A., Sadighi, F., & Riasati, M. J. (2021). Iranian EFL teachers’ receptive and productive metalinguistic knowledge: Does teaching context matter? Cogent Education, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2021.1952823

Prasetya, R. E. (2024). Exploring English language instruction through synchronous virtual meetings in Indonesian EFL context: Pedagogical approaches, opportunities and challenges, and multimedia integration. Journal on English as a Foreign Language, 14(1), 179–208. https://doi.org/10.23971/jefl.v14i1.7532

Purwati, D., Fathirma’ruf, F., Lakehu, A., & Taufik, T. (2024). Investigating Indonesian EFL preservice teachers’ digital technological awareness and their challenges in EFL learning: A case study. Journal on English as a Foreign Language, 14(1), 152–178. https://doi.org/10.23971/jefl.v14i1.7625

Reinhardt, J., & Bain, L. (2026). Digital games and gaming in language learning and teaching. Language Teaching, 59(3), 269–292. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444826101177

Reynolds, B. L., & Zhang, X. (2022). Medical school students’ preferences for and perceptions of teacher written corrective feedback on English as a second language academic writing: An intrinsic case study. Behavioral Sciences, 13(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13010013

Rezalou, A. (2020). Student teachers’ beliefs about corrective feedback. Atatürk Üniversitesi Kazım Karabekir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, (41), 416–430. https://doi.org/10.33418/ataunikkefd.795512

Shirafkan, E., Marzban, A., & Karimi, S. N. (2022). Developing and validating a questionnaire on EFL teachers’ beliefs about task-based language teaching (TBLT). Language Related Research, 13(5), 359–390. https://doi.org/10.52547/lrr.13.5.14

Singh, A. K., & Halim, H. A. (2023). Addressing challenges in language teaching in India: Exploring the role of corrective feedback in enhancing learning. Advanced Education, 10(22), 152–184. https://doi.org/10.20535/2410-8286.278042

Sukarno, S., Riyadini, M. V., & Alsamiri, Y. A. (2024). Navigating the digital shift: Unveiling the TPACK landscape among EFL educators in Indonesia. Script Journal: Journal of Linguistic and English Teaching, 9(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.24903/sj.v9i1.1580

Tang, X., Rousse-Malpat, A., & Duarte, J. (2024). Implementing translanguaging strategies in the English writing classroom in higher education. AILA Review, 39(1), 45–79. https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.23018.tan

Wang, L. (2022). Exploring the history and challenge of government-authorized English textbooks in Japan and mainland China. Espacio, Tiempo y Educación, 9(1), 236–255. https://doi.org/10.14516/ete.400

Downloads

Published

2026-10-24

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

The Role of Applied Metalinguistic Awareness and English Language Teaching Strategies in Enhancing EFL Learners’ Language Skills and Cognitive Skills. (2026). Journal of Applied Metalinguistics and Language Instruction (JAMLI), 1(2), 135-149. https://doi.org/10.36312/j4rr9p07